Fact Check: Was Hillary Clinton fired from Watergate investigation?

Note: June 2016:
For over 30 years I’d been tracking strange deaths near me, my employee, customers and friends.  My complaints well known with many public officials in the Bay Area.  Another real tragedy struck with the Strack Murders in Springville UT but this time is was my relatives but the murders and murder suicides kept roiling on. 

.

By Carole Fader Sat, Mar 8, 2014 @ 9:48 pm | updated Sat, Mar 8, 2014 @ 10:01 pm

Pat Carter/Associated Press

Hillary Rodham Clinton was criticized for her conduct during the Watergate investigation.

Times-Union readers want to know:

An email says that Hillary Clinton — then Hillary Rodham — was fired for lying and being unethical when she was a 27-year-old working on the Watergate investigation. Is this true?

The viral email is mainly derived from a column published on March 31, 2008, by Dan Calabrese, founder of North Star Writers Group, according to fact-finder TruthOrFiction.com. North Star was a newspaper syndicate that provided services until early 2012.

Calabrese’s information came from Democrat Jerry Zeifman, a counsel and chief of staff of the House Judiciary Committee, who supervised Clinton on the Watergate investigation. Zeifman’s 2006 book, “Hillary’s Pursuit of Power,” states that she “… engaged in a variety of self-serving unethical practices in violation of House rules.”

On his now-shuttered website, Zeifman said, “Hillary Clinton is ethically unfit to be either a senator or president — and if she were to become president, the last vestiges of the traditional moral authority of the party of Roosevelt, Truman and Johnson will be destroyed.”

Specifically, Zeifman contends that Rodham and others wanted Richard Nixon to remain in office to bolster the chances of Sen. Ted Kennedy or another Democrat being elected president.

Zeifman said that in 1974 a young lawyer who shared an office with Clinton came to him to apologize that he and Clinton had lied to him. The lawyer, John Labovitz, is quoted as saying that he was dismayed with “… her erroneous legal opinions and efforts to deny Nixon representation by counsel — as well as an unwillingness to investigate Nixon.”

Zeifman charges that Rodham regularly consulted with Ted Kennedy’s chief political strategist, a violation of House rules.

Hillary Rodham’s conduct, according to Zeifman, also was the result of not wanting Nixon to face an impeachment trial because Democrats worried that Nixon might bring up abuses of office by President John Kennedy.

Zeifman — ironically, a consultant to a member of the Judiciary Committee that impeached President Bill Clinton — said Democrats feared putting Watergate break-in mastermind E. Howard Hunt on the stand. Hunt, Zeifman said, might report on his knowledge of nefarious activities in the Kennedy administration “including Kennedy’s purported complicity in the attempted assassination of Fidel Castro.”

Zeifman also asserts that Rodham joined Burke Marshall, Ted Kennedy’s chief counsel in the Chappaquiddick affair and Rodham’s former law professor; special counsel John Doar; and senior associate special counsel (and future Clinton White House counsel) Bernard Nussbaum in trying to gain enough votes on the Judiciary Committee to change House rules and deny counsel to Nixon.

In order to pull this off, Zeifman said that Rodham wrote a fraudulent legal brief, and confiscated public documents.

After the Nixon impeachment investigation was finished, Zeifman fired Rodham and said he refused to give her a letter of recommendation.

According to the Calabrese column as reported by TruthOrFiction.com, Zeifman said he regrets not reporting Rodham to the appropriate bar association.

So what are we to make of all this? Calabrese’s interview with Zeifman has been published around the Internet and repeated by pundits such as Rush Limbaugh and Neil Boortz. But there is nothing to out-and-out confirm Zeifman’s rendition. That doesn’t mean it couldn’t be true, but it makes it difficult to arrive at the truth.

In addition, neither www.TruthOrFiction.com nor we could find any response from Hillary Clinton to Zeifman’s book or to his accusations.

Carole Fader: (904) 359-4635

East Bay homebuilder charged with bank fraud

By Matthias Gafni, mgafni@bayareanewsgroup.com

POSTED:   06/04/2016 05:28:47 AM PDT | UPDATED:   2 DAYS AGO

CONCORD -- Six years after federal agents raided the Seeno homebuilder headquarters, a visibly annoyed federal judge on Friday excoriated family members for failing to attend a hearing where one of their companies was expected to plead guilty to criminal bank fraud charges.

Related Case:

The Seeno’s were represented by Attorney James Greenan who leads to Alamo 1st Alamo CA where unknown to Bennett was another attorney and Alamo 1st member connected to Bennett v. Southern Pacific (1987) where a witness was murdered. 

Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers refused to agree to the plea deal because she said she did not have enough evidence to accept a fine and restitution of $11 million for Discovery Sales. Earlier in the day, the company was formally charged for its role in the "builder bailout" scam that allowed the Seeno companies to continue selling properties at high prices during the housing market downturn by obtaining mortgages for homebuyers through illegal means.

Federal Bureau of Investigations officers photograph documents outside of the Discovery Homes office at 4061 Port Chicago Highway in Concord, Calif., on Thursday Feb. 18, 2010. Federal agents have shut down two Seeno family development companies offices along Port Chicago Road while they execute search warrants. (Susan Tripp Pollard/Staff) (Susan Tripp Pollard/Bay Area News Group Archives)

Gonzalez Rogers focused her ire on the absence at the plea hearing of Discovery Sales President Albert Seeno III, who along with his father, Albert Seeno Jr., operates a Bay Area homebuilding empire.

"It's his company, and he's not here to take responsibility for what his company has done?" the judge asked two attorneys representing the Seeno company. "I find that a little odd. I don't find it particularly appropriate."

Gonzalez Rogers, who in recent years accepted plea deals from three former Seeno employees implicated in the scam, said she would not "rubber stamp" the agreement that would spare Seeno family member from individual criminal charges.

Advertisement

"The American people, rightly so, are very frustrated with the conduct which was criminal ... which led to the financial disaster in this country," the judge said. "(Seeno III) shows an unwillingness to publicly take accountability for his company's actions, and that says something for me whether the company is entitled (to the agreed-upon fine)."

In its plea agreement, the Seeno company acknowledged that through incentive programs, mortgage payment assistance and other means it fraudulently got banks to approve loans for unqualified buyers. In some cases, the homes were worth less than their inflated loans at the time of purchase.

Gonzalez Rogers asked why Seeno III was not charged.

"In the judgment of the U.S. Attorney's Office ... we don't have sufficient evidence to convict (Seeno III)," Assistant U.S. Attorney John Hemann said.

Seeno's attorneys, who declined to comment outside court, told the judge that company officials are not required to appear at such plea agreements and reminded her that not all the homes sold by Discovery Sales during that period were involved in the scheme.

Federal Bureau of Investigations officers walk from the Discovery Homes office at 4061 Port Chicago Highway in Concord, Calif., on Thursday Feb. 18, 2010 in order to take a photograph of the business where an employee stands near the entrance. Federal agents have shut down two Seeno family development company offices along Port Chicago Highway while they execute search warrants. (Susan Tripp Pollard/Staff) (Susan Tripp Pollard/Bay Area News Group Archives)

The agreement, if approved, would end the six-year investigation that netted indictments against three company employees and a half dozen Seeno associates. As a result of the homes they sold through the bailout scheme, the Seenos continued receiving large lines of credit from banks to remain operational.

"It allowed Discovery to stay in business over a difficult economic period in time," Hemann told the judge. "They staved off what was potentially bankruptcy or an enormous loss."

During a 16-month period in 2008 and 2009, when the alleged scam transpired, various Seeno companies opened at least $1.24 billion in construction lines of credit, according to an investigation by this newspaper.

More than 325 Seeno and Discovery homes sold from 2006 to 2008, exceeding $200 million in sales, used a series of illegal schemes, according to the charging document. The total loss is estimated at $75 million, but despite the bank fraud charge, Wells Fargo and JP Morgan Chase -- the two preferred lenders of Discovery Sales -- were hardly innocent victims, Hemann said.

"In this case, the banks are not fully without blame," Hemann said. "Wells Fargo made a lot of money. In fact, it may not have lost money at all through their relationship with Discovery Sales, and the same with JP Morgan Chase."

Prosecutors allege Wells Fargo and JP Morgan Chase would issue the loans, receive origination fees and quickly sell the loans, which would continue being sold and eventually packaged in securities.

"Everyone was making money gaming the system, or at least trying to do so: the builders, the buyers, the real estate agents, the mortgage brokers and the originating banks, and the banks who securitized the bad loans," Hemann wrote in his sentencing memorandum.

"The losers are way downstream and essentially the American people," Hemann told the judge.

Seeno attorney William Goldman told the judge that determining the actual losses in this case would be difficult and time-consuming because tracing the loans as they went deeper downstream was "basically impossible."

As part of the tentative agreement, the Seenos had agreed to pay $3 million in restitution to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, two taxpayer-sponsored financial services companies, according to court documents. Discovery Sales will also be placed on probation for five years.

Two of three former Seeno employees who cooperated with FBI investigators have yet to be sentenced for their guilty pleas as part of this scheme. In February, Jason Sterlino was sentenced to six months in prison for what Hemann called "minor fraud" done to further the scheme.

Former Discovery Sales Vice President Ayman Shahid and sales executive Carey Hendrickson have also pleaded guilty and were supposed to be sentenced this month, but their attorneys said those hearings have been postponed.

Contact Matthias Gafni at 925-952-5026. Follow him at Twitter.com/mgafni.